Section 51 of the 2007 Act provides a limitation on liability to the offences in Part 2 where the offence encouraged or assisted was created in order to protect a category of people and the person doing the encouraging or assisting falls into that category and was the person in respect of whom the offence was or would have been committed. Section 50 of the 2007 Act provides a defence to the offences in Part 2 where the encouragement or assistance is considered to be reasonable in the circumstances the person knew to exist or he reasonably believed to exist. They allow people who assist another to commit an offence to be prosecuted regardless of whether the underlying substantive offence is actually committed or attempted. These offences replace the common law offence of incitement for all offences committed after 1 October 2008. Part 2 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 creates, at sections 44 to 46, three inchoate offences of intentionally encouraging or assisting an offence encouraging or assisting an offence believing it will be committed and encouraging or assisting offences believing one or more will be committed. There are instances where a substantive offence may not have been completed but nevertheless an offence of a different kind has been committed because of the actions or agreements in preparation for the substantive offence. Conspiracy to Commit Offences outside England and Wales. Newsweek also reached out to Roche Freedom for additional comment on the case but did not hear back before publication. The remaining universities have not yet responded to Newsweek for a request for comment. Similarly, a representative for Rice University said Tuesday that the lawsuit is "without merit," stating that "Rice University is proud of its financial aid practices and we are prepared to vigorously defend them in court." If we are served with the complaint, we will conduct a full review and respond as appropriate through the legal process," the spokesperson said. undergraduate applicants independent of ability to pay tuition, and we meet the full demonstrated financial need of those students who matriculate. Brown is fully committed to making admission decisions for U.S. "Brown is prepared to mount a strong effort to make this clear. A university spokesperson for Yale told Newsweek that the school's financial policy is "100 percent compliant with all applicable laws," while a spokesperson for Caltech said they are currently viewing the lawsuit but have "confidence in our financial aid practices."Ī representative for Brown University told Newsweek that they have not yet been served the lawsuit and believe the complaint has "no merit." Representatives from Northwestern, Duke, Dartmouth, Notre Dame, the University of Chicago, and the University of Pennsylvania have so far declined to comment on the pending litigation. The lawsuit ultimately seeks damages for the plaintiffs and an end to the schools' collaboration in making financial aid decisions. Up to 170,000 former undergraduate students who received partial financial aid because of university collusion in the past 18 years could join the case, according to lawyers. "While conspiring together on a method for awarding financial aid, which raises net tuition prices, defendants also consider the wealth of applicants and their families in making admissions decisions," Eric Rosen, a partner at Roche Freedman, one of the firms involved in the suit, told the Journal. The lawsuit also alleges that some of the universities gave an admission advantage to children of wealthy donors, while others weighed students' finances to determine if they should be taken off a waiting list or admitted for specific school programs, according to the Journal. "Far from following this practice, at least nine Defendants for many years have favored wealthy applicants in the admissions process." "Under a true need-blind admissions system, all students would be admitted without regard to the financial circumstances of the student or student's family," the plaintiffs wrote in the complaint. The new lawsuit alleges that the schools in this group considered candidates' ability to pay in some cases and therefore violated those guidelines. Under Section 568 of the federal Improving America's Schools Act, universities can collaborate on financial aid strategies as long as they do not consider an applicant's financial need during admissions decisions, the Yale Daily News reported. Above, Georgetown University, one of the schools named in the suit. universities are being sued for allegedly violating antitrust laws.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |